伊人伊人伊人-伊人伊人网-亚洲av综合色区-亚洲av中文无码乱人伦在线视色-少妇饥渴放荡91麻豆-少妇黄色片-日本www在线观看-日本www在线-嫩草视频在线观看-嫩草视频在线播放-久久精品一区二区三区四区-久久精品一区二区三区不卡牛牛-国产又粗又黄视频-国产又粗又黄的视频-丰满人妻av一区二区三区-丰满女人又爽又紧又丰满

Whenever tightening tools are discussed, the conversation inevitably turns to their accuracy—because accuracy is the decisive factor for joint quality. Different classes of tools carry different accuracy ratings, typically in the ranges of ±20 %, ±10 %, or ±5 %.

Examples
? Low-assembly-requirement applications (e.g., electronic toys) often use pneumatic screwdrivers or basic electric screwdrivers with 10 %–20 % accuracy. These tools meet basic tightening needs but cannot detect or report skipped, cross-threaded, or floating screws.
? In automotive plants, even non-critical interior trim stations generally require current-controlled tools with 5 %–10 % accuracy. These tools guarantee correct torque/angle and can flag tightening anomalies.
? Safety- or function-critical joints demand sensor-controlled tightening spindles with 3 %–5 % accuracy. These units monitor torque and angle in real time, store the data, and ensure full traceability.

How to Compare Tool Performance
Performance cannot be judged by intuition; it must be quantified. The German automotive industry introduced two rigorous indices: Cm and Cmk.

Definitions
? Cm (machine capability, no offset)
? Cmk (machine capability with offset)

Rule of Thumb
A tool is considered “good” only if
Cm ≥ 1.67 and Cmk ≥ 1.33.

Analogy
Two shooters both hit a tight cluster—similar stability (Cm). Shooter 2’s cluster is closer to the bull’s-eye, so Shooter 2 has better combined stability + accuracy (higher Cmk). Use Cm and Cmk to rank tools objectively.

Formulas
THI = upper torque limit
TLO = lower torque limit
μ = mean of test values
σ = standard deviation of test values

Cm = (THI ? TLO) / (6 σ)
Cmk = min[(THI ? μ)/(3 σ), (μ ? TLO)/(3 σ)]

Worked Example
Target torque = 0.8 Nm
Allowed tolerance = ±10 % → THI = 0.88 Nm, TLO = 0.72 Nm
25 test readings: μ = 0.81 Nm, σ = 0.011 Nm

Cm = (0.88 ? 0.72) / (6 × 0.011) = 2.42
Cmk = min[(0.88 ? 0.81)/(3 × 0.011), (0.81 ? 0.72)/(3 × 0.011)]
??= min[2.12, 2.73] = 2.12

Because both indices exceed the required limits, the tool is performing well and no re-calibration is necessary.